蔡司 ClearView 現成單光鏡片
以超越標準的現成鏡片脫穎而出。
使用蔡司ClearView現成單光鏡片,讓你可以與標準現成單光鏡片相約的成本和交貨時間,為你的客戶提供Freeform自由成形改良的所有好處。
標準現成鏡片在光學方面需要妥協。
現成單光鏡片具備成本較低且交貨期較短的明顯優勢,是全球最暢銷的光學鏡片。然而,對每一位眼鏡配戴者對而言,現成單光鏡片在其中一個最重要特性方面明顯遜色:它們通常無法在遠離鏡片中心的地方提供出色的光學性能。特別是,現成單光鏡片在追求更平、更薄的同時,就需要在周邊光學性能作出取捨。
蔡司 ClearView 現成單光鏡片
靈感源自於消費者需求消費者追求舒適度和清晰度,但標準現成鏡片在光學方面需要妥協。2 蔡司透過評估光學質素和改進鏡片計算的方法,從而提升了傳統現成單光鏡片的光學設計。
光學與美學新突破。
使用蔡司 ClearView 現成單光鏡片,配戴者可從鏡片中心到周邊體驗到出色的清晰視覺,鏡片比傳統鏡片設計更為平坦、更為纖薄、外觀更吸引,而傳統鏡片設計則需要較彎的基弧來提供可接受的光學性能。
蔡司 ClearView 現成單光鏡片獲得客戶認可的滿意度
經單光鏡片配戴者盲測配戴測試證實,蔡司 ClearView 現成單光鏡片比傳統的現成單光鏡片優勝。2-
1
Based on a visual clarity simulation of a 50 mm diameter lens area for 1.60 index ZEISS ClearView FSV lenses compared to 1.60 ZEISS AS FSV lenses. Average of +5D, +3D, +1D, -1D, -3D, -5D, and -7D with and without a cylinder of -2D. Quantitative analyses by Technology & Innovation, Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH, 2020.
-
2
Study participants were asked to rate how important different aspects (“price”, “to see clearly across the entire lens”, “easy to adapt to”, “comfortable vision across the entire lens”, “aesthetics”, “available coatings”, “matches the frame”) are for them, when choosing new spectacle lenses. Wearer trial comparing 1.60 ZEISS ClearView FSV and 1.60 ZEISS AS FSV in a laboratory setup and in everyday life. N=20 study participants. Technology & Innovation, Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH, 2020.
-
3
Measurements of lens thickness on 1.60 ZEISS ClearView FSV lenses compared to ZEISS SPH FSV lenses over a range of prescriptions (-5, -3, -1, +1, +3, +5D with and without cyl -2D). Maximum reduction of 16% for centre thickness of +5.00/-2.00.Quantitative analyses by Technology & Innovation, Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH, 2020.
-
4
Measurements of lens thickness (edge thickness at 50mm diameter for minus lenses; center thickness for plus lenses) on 1.60 ZEISS ClearView FSV lenses compared to ZEISS AS FSV lenses over a range of prescriptions (-7, -5, -3, -1, +1, +3, +5D with and without cyl -2D). Maximum reduction of 8% for centre thickness of +3.00/0.00.Quantitative analyses by Technology & Innovation, Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH, 2020.
-
5
Measurements of lens flatness (base curve) on 1.60 ZEISS ClearView FSV lenses compared to ZEISS SPH FSV lenses over a range of prescriptions (-5, -3, -1, +1, +3, +5D with and without cyl -2D). Maximum reduction of 49% of -5.00D with and without cyl -2D. Quantitative analyses by Technology & Innovation, Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH, 2020.
-
6
Measurements of lens flatness (base curve) on 1.60 ZEISS ClearView FSV lenses compared to ZEISS AS FSV lenses over a range of prescriptions (-7,-5,-3,-1,+1,+3,+5D with and without cyl -2D). Maximum reduction of 32% for -5.00D with cyl -2D. Quantitative analyses by Technology & Innovation, Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH, 2020.
-
7
Measurements of lens flatness (base curve) on 1.60 ZEISS ClearView FSV Lenses compared to ZEISS SPH FSV Lenses. Average of -5D, -3D, -1D, +1D, +3D, +5D with and without cyl -2D. Maximum reduction of 49% of -5.00D with and without -2D cyl for minus lenses. Maximum reduction of 25% of 5.00D with and without -2D cyl for plus lenses. Quantitative analyses by Technology & Innovation, Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH, 2020.